Relationship Between Tracheostomization and Survival in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Respiratory Symptoms Suggestive of COVID-19 in Cartagena, Colombia

Keywords: Tracheostomy, Respiration; Artificial, Coronavirus Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Colombia, COVID-19

Abstract

Introduction. COVID-19 has generated one of the highest disease burdens in the 21st century. To date, there are more than 280 million estimated cases globally. Many aspects of this condition are still unknown, which causes controversy in how to approach critically ill patients. Tracheostomy is an intervention that has been shown to be beneficial in the management of respiratory disease, however, there is an evidence gap on the effectiveness and safety of this intervention in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Consequently, the aim of this study was to relate the time elapsed from the onset of the clinical condition, during intubation and days of mechanical ventilation, to performing the tracheostomy, with the survival of patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Methodology. Retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted between March 2020 and February 2021 in two fourth-level hospitals in the city of Cartagena, Colombia. It included patients older than 18 years who were admitted to the intensive care unit due to the need for invasive mechanical ventilation for viral respiratory symptoms. Those with incomplete medical records and hospitalized for other respiratory causes were excluded. Results. A total of 122 patients were included in the study with a median age of 63 years (IQR 22; 20-89), with 66.4% (n = 81) being male. No significant correlation was found between the number of days from the onset of the clinical condition to the performance of tracheostomy (p = 0.12), nor between the time elapsed from endotracheal intubation to the performance of tracheostomy, with respect to survival (p = 0.53). However, there was a relationship between the number of days of invasive mechanical ventilation and the final outcome (p = 0.02). Discussion. Although it has been reported that tracheostomy is one of the riskiest procedures in the management of patients with severe respiratory symptoms, during the COVID-19 pandemic the literature describes that this intervention increases survival, decreases the time required for mechanical ventilation and reduces the length of stay in the intensive care unit. The number of complications is very low in comparison to the benefit it confers, and it was observed that the local behavior is very similar to that reported in the literature. Conclusions. Time from symptom onset or endotracheal intubation to the performance of tracheostomy does not correlate with survival in patients with respiratory symptomatology suggestive of COVID-19 who are mechanically ventilated and tracheostomized.

Author Biographies

Efraín Antonio Gómez-Cardona, Universidad de Cartagena

Physician, Specialist in General Surgery. Surgical Department, Universidad de Cartagena. Cartagena, Bolívar, Colombia.

Daniela Díaz-Hernández, Hospital Naval de Cartagena

Physician. Critical Care and Obstetrics Research Group, Hospital Naval de Cartagena. Cartagena, Bolívar, Colombia.

Diana Patricia Borré-Naranjo, Centro Hospitalario Serena del Mar

Physician, Specialist in General Medicine and Critical Care. Critical Care and Obstetrics Research Group, Centro Hospitalario Serena del Mar. Cartagena, Bolívar, Colombia.

Carmelo Dueñas-Castell, Universidad de Cartagena

Physician, Specialist in Pneumology and Critical Care, Professor. Critical Care and Obstetrics Research Group, Department of Critical Care, Universidad de Cartagena. Cartagena, Bolívar, Colombia.

Iván David Lozada-Martínez, Universidad de Cartagena

Medical student, Vice President of Future Surgeons Chapter. Asociación Colombiana de Cirugía, Prometheus and Biomedicine Applied to Clinical Sciences Group, School of Medicine, Universidad de Cartagena. Cartagena, Bolívar, Colombia.

Yelson Alejandro Picón-Jaimes, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Quirúrgicas, Future Surgeons Chapter, Asociación Colombiana de Cirugía

Physician, Specialist in Bioethics Applied to the Experimental Field and Master in Bioethics. Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Quirúrgicas, Future Surgeons Chapter, Asociación Colombiana de Cirugía. Santiago, Metropolitan Region of Santiago, Chile.

Katherine Lizeth Muñoz-Murillo, Universidad del Quindío

Medical Department, Universidad del Quindío. Armenia, Quindío, Colombia.

References

Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2020;382(8):727-733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. Coronavirus Resource Center. COVID-19 Map [Internet]. [Consultado 28 de diciembre de 2021]. Recuperado a partir de: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents [Internet]. 2020;55(3):105924. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924

Marraro GA, Spada C. Consideration of the respiratory support strategy of severe acute respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. Chin J Contemp Pediatr [Internet]. 2020;22(3):183-194. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.zgddek.com/EN/abstract/abstract24947.shtml

Zhang X, Huang Q, Niu X, Zhou T, Xie Z, Zhong Y, et al. Safe and effective management of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Head Neck [Internet]. 2020;42(7):1374-1381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26261

Evrard D, Jurcisin I, Assadi M, Patrier J, Tafani V, Ullmann N, et al. Tracheostomy in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and follow-up: A parisian bicentric retrospective cohort. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(12):e0261024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261024

Tornari C, Surda P, Takhar A, Amin N, Dinham A, Harding R, et al. Tracheostomy, ventilatory wean, and decannulation in COVID-19 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2021;278(5):1595-1604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06187-1

van-Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2020;382(16):1564-1567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973

Hilarión-Gaitán L, Díaz-Jiménez D, Cotes-Cantillo K, Castañeda-Orjuela C. Desigualdades en salud según regimen de afiliación y eventos notificados al Sistema de Vigilancia (Sivigila) en Colombia, 2015. Biomédica [Internet]. 2019;39(4):737-747. doi: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.4453

McGrath BA, Brenner MJ, Warrillow SJ, Pandian V, Arora A, Cameron TS, et al. Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 era: global and multidisciplinary guidance. Lancet Respir Med [Internet]. 2020; 8(7):717-725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30230-7

Singh RK, Saran S, Baronia AK. The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-a systematic review. J Intensive Care [Internet]. 2017;5:38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0234-z

Takhar A, Walker A, Tricklebank S, Wyncoll D, Hart N, Jacob T, et al. Recommendation of a practical guideline for safe tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2020;277(8):2173-2184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05993-x

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis [Internet]. 1987;40(5):373-383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

Charlson ME, Charlson RE, Paterson JC, Marinopoulos SS, Briggs WM, Hollenberg JP. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primare care patients. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2008;61(12):1234-1240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.006

Cabré L, Mancebo JF, Solsona P, et al. Multicenter study of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in intensive care units: the usefulness of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in decision making. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2005;31(7):927-933. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2640-2

Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Resolución 8430 de 1993 [Internet]. [Consultado 26 Sep 2021]. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF

Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM – principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos [Internet]. [Consultado 26 de septiembre de 2021]. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/

Tyrrell CSB, Mytton OT, Gentry SV, Thomas-Meyer M, Allen JLY, Narula AA, et al. Managing intensive care admissions when there are not enough beds during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Thorax [Internet]. 2021;76:302–312. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215518

David AP, Russell MD, El-Sayed IH, Russell MS. Tracheostomy guidelines developed at a large academic medical center during the COVID-19 pandemic. Head Neck [Internet]. 2020; 42(6):1291-1296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26191

Mehta C, Mehta Y. Percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Card Anaesth [Internet]. 2017;20:S19-S25. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.197793

Heyd CP, Desiato VM, Nguyen SA, O'Rourke AK, Clemmens CS, Awad MI, et al. Tracheostomy protocols during COVID-19 pandemic. Head Neck [Internet]. 2020;42(6):1297-1302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26192

Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Calvo-Henríquez C, Fakhry N, Karkos PD, Peer S, et al. Systematic review of international guidelines for tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Oral Oncol [Internet]. 2020;108:104844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104844

Piombino P, Troise S, Vargas M, Marra A, Buonanno P, Fusetti S, et al. A systematic review of the literature on the role of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci [Internet]. 2020;24(23):12558-12574. doi: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202012_24053

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham COVID-19 airway team. Safety and 30-day outcomes of tracheostomy for COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2020;125(6):872-879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.023

Benito DA, Bestourous DE, Tong JY, Pasick LJ, Sataloff RT. Tracheotomy in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weaning, Decannulation, and Survival. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2021;165(3):398-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820984780

Staibano P, Levin M, McHugh T, Gupta M, Sommer DD. Association of Tracheostomy With Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2021:e210930. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0930

Shah R, Priyadarshini G, Parsana M. "A Systematic Review on Guidelines and Recommendations for Tracheostomy During COVID-19 Pandemic". Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02517-9

Mandal A, Nandi S, Chhebbi M, Basu A, Ray M. A Systematic Review on Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients: Current Guidelines and Safety Measures. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02152-w

Wei Y, Wei L, Jiang Y, Shen S, Zhao Y, Hao Y, et al. Implementation of Clinical Diagnostic Criteria and Universal Symptom Survey Contributed to Lower Magnitude and Faster Resolution of the COVID-19 Epidemic in Wuhan. Engineering [Internet]. 2020;6(10):1141-1146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.04.008

Walley J, Otu A, Effa E, French L, Onwusaka O. Clinical Diagnosis and Reporting of COVID-19 in the Absence of Effective Access to Laboratory Testing in Africa. Front Public Health [Internet]. 2021;9:645200. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.645200

Cadegiani FA, Zimerman RA, Campello de Souza B, McCoy J, Pereira-e Costa RA, Wambier CG, et al. The AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Prompt, Feasible, Costless, and Highly Sensitive Diagnostic Tool for COVID-19 Based on a 1757-Patient Cohort. Cureus [Internet]. 2021;13(1):e12565. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12565

How to Cite
1.
Gómez-Cardona EA, Díaz-Hernández D, Borré-Naranjo DP, Dueñas-Castell C, Lozada-Martínez ID, Picón-Jaimes YA, et al. Relationship Between Tracheostomization and Survival in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Respiratory Symptoms Suggestive of COVID-19 in Cartagena, Colombia. MedUNAB [Internet]. 2022 May 10 [cited 2026 Mar. 9];25(1):9-30. Available from: https://revistasunabeduco.biteca.online/index.php/medunab/article/view/4227

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2022-05-10

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Escanea para compartir
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo

Some similar items: