Care Approach to Cyberpsychology: Ethical Considerations
Abstract
Introduction. The spread of new information and communication technologies results in cyberpsychology being proposed as the integration of new digital media into human relationships and life, also, as technological immersion in professional practices. This implies challenges in understanding the changes that technology has produced in individual and social development. The objective of this article was to propose a reflection on the ethical aspects of cyberpsychology and its practical implications, according to a care approach which integrates the wellbeing principle in a virtual environment. Topics of reflection. Firstly, the main regulations for cyberpsychology are analyzed in the framework of the ethical and bioethical principles, with emphasis on the Colombian context. Secondly, we reflect on the care approach and some considerations for digital media. Finally, some practical implications of cyberpsychology are reviewed. Conclusions. The care approach and its application to cyberpsychology is one of the ethical anchors aimed at the promotion of wellbeing-based relationships. Ethical discussions from the care approach to digital media integrate technical-professional competency with ethical competency. This implies a constant analysis of the appropriation of technologies as a meeting space and as part of the commitment to self and user care.
References
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Más de 18 mil atenciones en salud mental en opción 4 de Línea 192; 2021 [Internet]. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Paginas/Mas-de-18-mil-atenciones-en-salud-mental-en-opcion-4-de-Linea-192.aspx#:~:text=%22Las%20personas%20que%20m%C3%A1s%20buscan,%2C45%20%25%22%2C%20asegur%C3%B3%20la
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Registro Especial de Prestadores de Servicios de Salud - REPS. 2022 [Internet] [citado el 14 de junio de 2022].
Recuperado a partir de: https://prestadores.minsalud.gov.co/habilitacion/
World Health Organization. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening [Internet]. 2019. Recuperado a partir
de: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550505
American Psychological Association (APA). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology, APA. [Internet] 2013;68(9):791-800. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/amp-a0035001.pdf
Baier AL. The Ethical Implications of Social Media: Issues and Recommendations For Clinical Practice. Ethics & Behavior [Internet]. 2018;29(5):341–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1516148
Acero PD, Cabas K, Caycedo C, Figueroa P, Patrick G, Martínez-Rudas M. Telepsicología: sugerencias para la formación y el desempeño profesional
responsable. ASCOFAPSI [Internet]. 2020. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.colpsic.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Telepsicologia_web.pdf
Ramos-del-Río B, Martí-Noguera JJ (Coord). Experiencias en ciberpsicología: hacia una nueva era de la psicología. México: UNAM, FES Zaragoza
[Internet]. 2022. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.zaragoza.unam.mx/wp-content/2022/Publicaciones/libros/csociales/Ciberpsicologia.pdf
Del Castillo-Salazar D, Rodriguez-Abrahantes TN. La ética de la investigación científica y su inclusión en las ciencias de la salud. Acta méd centro [Internet].
;12(2):213-227. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.revactamedicacentro.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/880
Wind TR, Rijkeboer M, Andersson G, Riper H. The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interventions [Internet]. 2020;20:100317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317
Zhu D, Paige SR, Slone H, Gutierrez A, Lutzky C, Hedriana H, et al. Exploring telemental health practice before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare [Internet]. 2021;9:1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211025943
Congreso de la República. Ley 1090 de 2006 por la cual se reglamenta el ejercicio de la profesión de Psicología, se dicta el Código Deontológico y
Bioético y otras disposiciones [Internet]. 2006. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.colpsic.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Ley-1090-de-2006-anotaciones-jurisprudencia.pdf
Congreso de la República. Ley 1438 de 2011 por medio de la cual se reforma el sistema general de seguridad social en salud y se dictan otras disposiciones [Internet]. 2011. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/LEY%201438%20DE%202011.pdf
Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos. Deontología y bioética del ejercicio de la Psicología en Colombia (7ed.). Bogotá: Manual Moderno; 2019. 14. Congreso de la República. Ley 1419 de 2010 por la cual se establecen los lineamientos para el desarrollo de la telesalud en Colombia [Internet]. 2010. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Leyes/1679693
KKurtines WM. Moral behavior as rule governed behavior: person and situation effects on moral decision making. J Pers and Soc Psychol [Internet]. 1986;50(4):784-791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.784
Hayes SC, Gifford EV, Hayes GJ. Moral behavior and the development of verbal regulation. Behav Analyst [Internet]. 1998;21:253–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391967
Dittrich A. What is ethical behavior? En Todorov JC. (Edt) Trends in Behavior Analysis. Brasilia: Technopolitik [Internet]. 2016;9-47. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306575273_What_is_ethical_behavior
Páramo-Bernal P. La educación en reglas morales. Rev. Colomb. Educ [Internet]. 2019;76:195-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num76-7980
Peláez M. Morality as a system of rule-governed behavior and empathy. Behavioral Development Bulletin [Internet]. 2001;10(1):8-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100475
Ballesteros-de Valderrama BP, Berrío-Acosta GM, Sánchez-Ramírez M, Amaya-Martínez LR. Razonamiento y juicio ético de profesionales de la Psicología en Iberoamérica. Estudio en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario (en
prensa) [Internet]. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.12804/urosario9789587848380
Crawford MJ, Thana L, Farquharson L, Palmer L, Hancock E, Bassett P, et al. Patient experience of negative effects of psychological treatment: results of a national survey. Br J Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016;208(3):260-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162628
Boisvert CM, Faust D. Iatrogenic Symptoms in Psychotherapy: A theoretical Exploration of the Potential Impact of Labels, Language, and Belief Systems. Am J Psychother [Internet]. 2018;56(2):244-259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2002.56.2.244
Parry GD, Crawford MJ, Duggan C. Iatrogenic harm from psychological therapy-time to move on. Br J Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016;208(3):210-212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.163618
Rodríguez-Cahill C, Ruiz-Llavero G, Martín-Escudero D, Garnelo-Fernández P, Sánchez-Rodriguez F, Casares-Garcia MI, et al. Iatrogenia en personas diagnosticadas de trastorno límite de la personalidad. Clínica Contemporánea [Internet]. 2021;12(3):e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.5093/cc2021a21
Unión Internacional de Ciencia Psicológica (IUPsyS), Asociación Internacional de Psicología Aplicada (IAAP). Declaración Universal de Principios Éticos
para Psicólogas y Psicólogos [Internet]. 2008. Recuperado a partir de: https://archive.org/details/iaap-iupsys-declaracion-universal-de-principioseticos-para-psicologas-y-psicologos/page/n1/mode/2up
Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. 38th ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982/2003. 27. Pineda JA. Trabajo de cuidado: mercantilización y desvalorización. Rev CS [Internet]. 2019;(especial):111-136. doi: https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.iEspecial.3218
Fisher B, Tronto J. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. En Emily Abel y Margaret Nelson Circles of Care. Nueva York: University of New York Press.
;p 35-61. 29. Armendane GD. Por un cuidado respetuoso. Rev de Bioét [Internet]. 2018;26(3):343-349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422018263253
Alvarado-García A. La ética del cuidado. Aquichan [Internet]. 2004;4(1):30-39. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-59972004000100005&lng=en&tlng=es
Durán-Palacio NM. La ética del cuidado: una voz diferente. Revista Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó [Internet]. 2015;2(1):12-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.21501/23823410.1476
Polo-Santillán MA. La responsabilidad ética. Veritas [Internet]. 2019;42:49-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-92732019000100049
Burbach F, Pote H. Digital approaches – a paradigm shift?. J. Fam Ther [Internet]. 2021;43(2):169-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12336
McClellan MJ, Osbaldiston R, Wu R., Yeager R, Monroe AD, McQueen T, et al. The effectiveness of telepsychology with veterans: A meta-analysis of
services delivered by videoconference and phone. Psychological Services [Internet]. 2021;19(2):294-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000522
Stefanopoulou E, Hogarth H, Taylor M, Russell-Haines K, Lewis D, Larkin J. Are digital interventions effective in reducing suicidal ideation and self-harm? A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health [Internet]. 2020;29(2):207–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2020.1714009
Fu Z, Burger H, Arjadi R, Bockting CLH. Effectiveness of digital psychological interventions for mental health problems in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry [Internet].
;7(10):851-864. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30256-X
Arango-Zuleta CC, Calle-García JA, Gómez-Yepes VH. El cuidado de sí, una mirada desde la virtualidad. Kénosis [Internet]. 2020;8(15):56-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.47286/23461209.365
Kocsis BJ, Yellowlees P. Telepsychotherapy and the Therapeutic Relationship: Principles, Advantages, and Case Examples. Telemed J e-Health [Internet]. 2018;24(5):329-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0088
Jarne-Esparcia A. La psicología de Internet y la psicología en internet. Regulación deontológica y ética de la intervención psicológica a través de Internet.
Psicologia em Revista [Internet]. 2002;8(12):11-23. Recuperado a partir de: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/psicologiaemrevista/article/view/143
Karcher NR, Presser NR. Ethical and Legal Issues Addressing the Use of Mobile Health (mHealth) as an Adjunct to Psychotherapy. Ethics & Behavior [Internet]. 2018;28(1):1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1229187
Gutiérrez-Provecho ML, López-Aguado M, García-Llamas JL, Quintanal-Diaz J. La brecha digital en población en riesgo de exclusión social. PSRI [Internet]. 2021;39:123-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2021.39.08
Watson A, Mellotte H, Hardy A, Peters E, Keen N, Kane F. The digital divide: factors impacting on uptake of remote therapy in a South London psychological therapy service for people with psychosis. J Ment Health [Internet]. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1952955
Domínguez-Alcón C. Ética del cuidado y robots. Cultura de los Cuidados [Internet]. 2017;21(47). Recuperado a partir de: https://culturacuidados.ua.es/article/view/2017-n47-etica-del-cuidado-y-robots.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2022 MedUNAB
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
