Construction and validation of an obstetric violence measurement scale in Colombia
Abstract
Introduction. Obstetric violence is a phenomenon that consists of the over-medicalization of the process of delivery. This is still ongoing but invisible in different countries in Latin America. Hence, this research aimed to develop and validate an instrument capable of measuring obstetric violence contextualized to the Colombian scenario. Methodology. The items were constructed from previous qualitative research. The items were constructed from previous qualitative research. The scale was validated through classical test theory, evaluating internal consistency and appearance and content validity, and through item response theory, using the Rasch model to assess the discrimination capacity of the scale, the adjustment of the items to the measurement process, the information functions and the distribution of people and items throughout the construct with a sample of 250 women with experience of institutionalized childbirth. Results. Factor analysis allowed us to find a three-factor structure. The internal consistency coefficients were between 0.79 and 0.87. All items were adjusted to the measurement process, covering various constructs. Discussion. In the literature, other Latin American scales address the construct with classical test theory; however, HUMANITY has shown favorable coefficients that measure the construct based on previous qualitative research. Conclusions. HUMANITY is a valid and reliable scale to quantitatively measure obstetric violence in the Colombian context.
References
Román S. Mesa de Reflexión: El derecho a la Salud y la prevención de la violencia obstétrica la 28 de junio 2022; Puebla: Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Estado de Puebla (México); 2022. 24 p.
Colombia, Congreso de la Republica. Proyecto de ley 147 de 2017, Medidas para prevenir y sancionar la violencia obstétrica, http://leyes.senado.gov.co/proyectos/index.php/textos-radicados-senado/p-ley-2017-2018/1036-proyecto-de-ley-147-de-2017
Sando D, Abuya T, Asefa A, Banks KP, Freedman LP, Kujawski S, et al. Methods used in prevalence studies of disrespect and abuse during facility based childbirth: lessons learned. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0389-z
Madrid C, De León MÁ, Delgado MJ, Cancino LG, Rangel J P, Soto BE, et al. Prevalencia de violencia obstétrica a pacientes durante el trabajo de parto a puerperio mediato por el personal de un hospital público. Lux Médica. 2019;14(42):27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.33064/42lm20192245
Mena D, Iglesias S, González VM, Cervera Á, Andreu L, Valero MJ. Obstetric violence in Spain (part I): Women’s perception and interterritorial differences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217726
OMS: Organización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones de la OMS para los cuidados durante el parto, para una experiencia de parto. [Internet] Ginebra OMS; 2018. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-18.12
OMS: Organización Mundial de la Salud. Prevención y erradicación de la falta de respeto y el maltrato durante la atención del parto en centros de salud. [Internet] Ginebra OMS; 2014. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-14.23
The conversation: Pramono A, Dahlen H, Desborough J, Smith JP. Separating mothers with COVID-19 from their newborns does more harm than good. [Internet]. Indonesia; 2020; Disponible en: http://theconversation.com/separating-mothers-with-covid-19-from-their-newborns-does-more-harm-than-good-141291
Aguilar L, Becerra A, Ardila A. Embarazo parto y puerperio: la madre en subordinación. Benessere. Revista de Enfermería. 2023, 8(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22370/bre.81.2023.3391.
Butler JP. Mecanismos psíquicos del Poder. 1a ed.Valencia: Ediciones Catedra S.A España; 2001. 218 p.
Bourdieu P. El sentido práctico. 1a ed. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina, 2007. 456 p
Foucault M. Vigilar y castigar. 1a ed. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina, 2022. 314 p
De Viana J, Mendes E, da Silva A, Machado MS. Perception of Puerperal Women in a Maternal and Children’s Hospital about Obstetric Violence in the State of Roraima. Rev. pesquisa cuidado fundamental. 2022; 14(1):1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v14.11680
Navarro MÁA. La violencia obstétrica, una práctica normalizada. Matronas Profesion. 2021; 22(2):73. https://search-ebscohost-com.fucsalud.basesdedatosezproxy.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cul&AN=153457477&lang=es&site=ehost-live
Baggio MA, Girardi C, Schapko TR, Hoffmann M. Planned Home Birth Assisted by a Midwife Nurse: Meanings, Experiences and Motivation for This Choice. Ciencia, Cuidado e Saude. 2022; 21:1–9. https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v21i0.57364
Cárdenas M, Salinero S. Validación de la escala de violencia obstétrica y pruebas de la invarianza factorial en una muestra de mujeres chilenas. Interdiscip Rev Psicol Cienc Afines. 2021;38(2):209–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.16888/interd.2021.38.2.14
Fors M, Falcon K, Brandão T, Vaca A, Cañadas S, Viada González CE. Confiabilidad y Dimensionalidad de EPREVO (“Experiencias de Parto Relacionadas a Violencia Obstétrica”): Desarrollo de un Nuevo Instrumento, Ecuador. Int J Womens Health. 2021; 13:569–77. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S305741
Maldonado-Suárez N, Santoyo-Telles F. Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos: Integración cuantitativa y cualitativa en la construcción de instrumentos de medición. Rev Innov Recer Educ. 2024; 17(2). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/reire.46238
Umamanita y El Parto es Nuestro. GUÍA PARA LA ATENCIÓN A LA MUERTE PERINATAL Y NEONATAL. Ascalema.Es 2009. Disponible en: https://www.ascalema.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/El-parto-es-Nuestro-y-Umamanita.-Gu%C3%ADa-para-la-atenci%C3%B3n-a-la-muerte-perinatal-y-neonatal..pdf
Joseph C. Cappelleri, J. Jason Lundy, Ron D. Hays. Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing PatientReported Outcome Measures. Clinical Therapeutics. 2014; Disponible desde: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.006
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
StataCorp. 2021. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC
Rosseel Y (2012). “lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Mair P, Hatzinger R (2007). “Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R.” Journal of Statistical Software, 20. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i09.
Rizopoulos D (2006). “ltm: An R package for Latent Variable Modelling and Item Response Theory Analyses.” Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05
Linacre JM. A User’s Guide to W I N S T E P S® M I N I S T E P Rasch-Model Computer Programs. 2024. Disponible desde: https://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf
Wickham H (2007). “Reshaping Data with the reshape Package.” Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12), 1–20. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v21/i12/)
William Revelle (2023). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.3.3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.)
Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-6. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
Ken Kelley (2019).The MBESS R Package, https://www3.nd.edu/~kkelley/site/MBESS.html
Ventura J, Caycho T. El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Rev Latinoam Cienc Soc Niñez Juv. 2017; 15(1):625–7. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77349627039
Viladrich C, Angulo A, Doval E. Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. An Psicol. 2017. 21;33(3):755. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401.
Colombia, Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 8430 de 1993, normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
INFORME BELMONT: Principios éticos y normas para el desarrollo de las investigaciones que involucran a seres humanos. Rev Medica Hered. 1979; 4(3). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v4i3.424
Fernández I. Revisión sistemática del tratamiento del trastorno de estrés postraumático postparto. Psicosom y Psiquiatr. 2018. (5) 29-39. https://doi.org/10.34810/PsicosomPsiquiatrnum0505
Fernández I. EL SÍNDROME DE ESTRÉS POSTRAUMÁTICO COMO SECUELA OBSTÉTRICA.Gob.es. 2010. https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/equidad/estresPostraumatico.pdf
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 MedUNAB

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |


























