A Presentation Design System to Promote the Lecturer-Audience Interaction in Lessons

Alan Ramírez-Noriega; Yobani Martínez-Ramírez; Samantha Jiménez; José Mendivil-Torres

doi:10.29375/25392115.4303

Alan Ramírez-Noriega Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8634-9988
Yobani Martínez-Ramírez Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4967-9187
Samantha Jiménez Universidad Autónoma de Baja California https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-7291
José Mendivil-Torres Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-8722

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29375/25392115.4303

Keywords: Digital presentations, Slides, Interaction, Usability

Abstract References How to Cite Downloads

Abstract

Slides are material that supports the information expressed by a speaker. Slides have increased their importance in education due to the multimedia information that we can represent in them and their easy access. Most conference or class presentations do not engage participants in an adequate way. Therefore, this research aims to develop a presentation and survey system in a real-time web application that allows interaction between the teacher-lecturer and the audience in an active way during the session. This research evaluated the system from three approaches: usability, acquired knowledge and user experience. The results suggested that SlideCheck could be an excellent option to encourage students to participate during classes, improve knowledge acquisition and improve interaction with the teacher during the session, making the lesson more dynamic.

References

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7.

Fowler, M., & Scott, K. (2000). UML Gota a Gota. Pearson.

Graham, K. (2015). TechMatters: Beyond Basic Presentations: Using Swipe to Engage and Interact With Your Audience, Wherever They Might Be. LOEX Quarterly, 42, 4.

Grzych, G., & Schraen-Maschke, S. (2019). Interactive pedagogic tools: evaluation of three assessment systems in medical education. Annales de Biologie Clinique, 77(4), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2019.1464

Kuritza, V., Cibich, D., & Ahmad, K. A. (2020). Interactive presentation digital tool Mentimeter perceived as accessible and beneficial for exam preparation by medical students. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2020.02.002

Maroto García, M. de la N. (2007). Las Relaciones Conceptuales en la Terminología de los Productos Cerámicos y su Formalización Mediante un Editor de Ontologías.

Maroto Marín, O. (2008). El uso de la Presentaciones Digitales en la Educación Superior: Una Reflexión sobre la Práctica. Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 8(2), 23.

Mesía Maraví, R. (2011). Teaching use of the power point of slides. Investigación Educativa, 14(26), 161–171.

Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281

Pressman, R. (2010). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Sauro, J. (2018). 5 Ways to Interpret a SUS Score. MeasuringU. https://measuringu.com/interpret-sus-score/

Servatyari, K., Mardani, N., Servatyari, B., & Yazdanpanah, H. (2019). The study of factors affecting concentration in classroom among high school students in Divandarreh City, Iran, in 2018. Chronic Diseases Journal, 7(3), 153–159. http://cdjournal.muk.ac.ir/index.php/cdj/article/view/425

Sommerville, I. (2015). Software Engineering. Pearson.

Xin-geng, D., & Jian-xiang, L. (2011). Advantages and Disadvantages of PowerPoint in Lectures to Science Students.

How to Cite

Ramírez-Noriega, A., Martínez-Ramírez, Y., Jiménez, S., & Mendivil-Torres, J. (2022). A Presentation Design System to Promote the Lecturer-Audience Interaction in Lessons. Revista Colombiana De Computación, 23(2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.29375/25392115.4303