The limitations of the normative theories of Public Opinion in the informative and political reality of the 20th and 21st centuries.
Abstract
Political communication is a !eld of knowledge in the study of public opinion, inherent to Political Science. Numerous intellectuals throughout history have defended a political communication that seeks to promote civic responsibility and presents a democratizing character, in order to be cautious with the type of public opinion that is built in a society. In this paper we propose a critical analysis as a review with an interpretative hermeneutic approach, reviewing the theoretical tensions and positions in the 20th century, giving way to a research question: Has the technological revolution of the Internet in the 21st century helped those democratizing aspirations necessary for the informative task?
References
Bodillo, J.F. (1987). La Opinión Pública. Revista de Estudios Políticos (Nueva Época), n.58, octubre-diciembre.
Boladeras i Cucurella, Margarita. (2001). La opinión pública en Habermas, Anàlisi: quaderns de comunicació i cultura, n.26, p. 51-70
Castells, M. (2002). La dimensión cultural de internet. Universitat oberta de Catalunya, Debates culturales.
Castells, M. and Martínez Gimeno, C. (1999). La era de la información. 3rd ed. México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Dewey, John. (1998). The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, vol 14, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, p.227.
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Northwestern University Journal of Communication, 43.pp. 51-58.
Habermas, Jürgen (1974). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article, trans. Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox, New German Critique, 3, pp. 49-55.
Huntington, S. P. (1994). La tercera ola. La democratización a finales del siglo XX. Paidós Ibérica. ISBN: 84-7509-960-2
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., Gaudet, H. (1944) The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
Lippmann, Walter. (2011). El Público Fantasma. España: Genueve Ediciones.
McCombs, Maxwell. (2005). Setting The Agenda: The Mass Media And Public Opinion, Choice Reviews Online 42 (11). doi:10.5860/choice.42-6312.
Mosca, L. (2007). A Double-Faced Medium? The challenges and opportunities of the Internet for social movements. Max Weber Programme of the EUI, 23.
Nimmo, D.D. y Sanders, K.R. (1981) (eds). The Handbook Of Political Communication. Berverly Hills. Sage.
Noelle Neumann, Elisabeth. (1995). La Espiral Del Silencio. España: Paidós.
Pariser, Eli. (2017). El Filtro Burbuja. Barcelona: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.
Rubio, J.M. (2009). Opinión pública y medios de comunicación. Teoría de la agenda setting. Gazeta de Antropología, 25(1).
Tynan, Dan. (2006). "The 25 Worst Tech Products Of All Time". Pcworld. https://www.pcworld.com/article/125772/worst_products_ever.html.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2021 Reflexión Política
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
