Tweeting democracy the power of 280 characters: twitter ́s challenges and opportunities (X) for the Open Goverment
Abstract
In the face of the growing and widespread use of Twitter as a tool for government communications, it is relevant to explore its relationship with the development of the Open Government. This article examines the technical, political, and social implications of Twitter in Open Government policies through a methodology that combines theoretical re!ection and analysis of secondary sources. It focuses on analyzing the dimensions of Twitter as a social network, niche communication medium, and public opinion space. It becomes evident that Twitter presents both challenges and opportunities for the Open Government, as it offers greater visibility and transparency while also generating dynamics of polarization and disinformation that fuel post-truth. Furthermore, it is highlighted that Twitter plays a signi"cant role in shaping the political agenda and public opinion, albeit not presenting itself as a rational public sphere. Consequently, addressing these challenges and leveraging the opportunities offered by Twitter is essential for strengthening the Open Government within different conceptions of democracy in the digital era.”References
Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z. J., Ishola, A. A., Bello, M. L., & Oladimeji, K. A. (2022). The in"uence of openness of public organizations and social media use on e-participation: The mediating effect of trust in e-government. International Review of Public Administration, 27(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2136054
Adams, A., & McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 357-359. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016
Anderson, C. W. (2016). News Ecosystems. In: Witschge, T., Anderson, C.W., Domingo, D. & Hermida, A. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957909.n28
Barberá, P., & Rivero, G. (2012). ¿Un tweet, un voto? Desigualdad en la discusión política en Twitter. I Congreso Internacional en Comunicación Política y Estrategias de Campaña. Alice.
Bauman, Z. (2004): la modernidad líquida. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Benoit, S.L., y Mauldin, R.F. (2021). The “anti-vax” movement: a quantitative report on vaccine beliefs and knowledge across social media. BMC Public Health 21, 2106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8
Berggren, H. M., Fugate, G. A., Preuhs, R. R., & Still, D. R. (2004). Satis!ed? Institutional determinants of citizen evaluations of democracy. Politics & Policy, 32(1), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2004.tb00176.x
Boyd, D. y Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Canel, M. y Zamora, R. (2004). La comunicación en las organizaciones políticas: la estrategia permanente en el mercado de la visibilidad de los poderes públicos. En J. Losada (ed.), Gestión de comunicación en las organizaciones (pp. 515-542). Ariel.
Camaj, L. (2016). Between a rock and a hard place: Consequences of media clientelism for journalist–politician power relationships in the Western Balkans. Global Media and Communication, 12(3), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766516675649
Cifuentes, C. F., & Pino Uribe, J. F. (2018). Conmigo o contra mí: Análisis de la concordancia y estrategias temáticas del Centro Democrático en Twitter. Palabra Clave - Revista de Comunicación, 21(3), 885-916. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.10
Carrasco-Polaino, R., Martín-Cárdaba, M.-Á., & Villar- Cirujano, E. (2021). Citizen participation in Twitter: Anti-vaccine controversies in times of COVID-19. Comunicar, 29(69), 21-31. https:// doi.org/10.3916/C69-2021-02
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social media (ICWSM) (pp. 89-96). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14126
Dahl, R. A. (1989). La Poliarquía: Participación y Oposición. Tecnos.
Deakins, E., Dillon, S., al Namani, H., & Zhang (Kevin), C. (2010). Local e-government impact in China, New Zealand, Oman, and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(6), 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011069004
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1976). Introducción. En Rizoma. Pre-textos.
Del-Fresno-García, M. (2019). Desórdenes informativos: sobreexpuestos e infrainformados en la era de la posverdad. El profesional de la información, 28(3), e280302. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.02
Dubois, E. & Blank, G. (2018) The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
Garimella, V. R. K., & Weber, I. (2017). A Long-Term Analysis of Polarization on Twitter (pp. 528– 531). Quebec. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14918
Gil, H. A. P., Castro, K. A. C., & Bermúdez, G. M. T. (2017). La brecha digital en Colombia: Un análisis de las políticas gubernamentales para su disminución. Redes de Ingeniería (volumen especial), 59-71.
Gómez, L. (2016). Comunicación política por Twitter. Colombia a un tuit de la democracia. Universidad Sergio Arboleda.
Gamir-Ríos, J., Cano-Orón, L., & Baviera, T. (2022). Análisis del aumento de seguidores y de la presencia multiplataforma de la clase política en Facebook, Twitter e Instagram en campañas electorales (2011-2019). Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 24, 211-231. https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc.28295
Gorodnichenko Y, Pham, T & Talavera, O. (2018). Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection. Working Papers 2018-01. Swansea University, School of Management. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24631
Habermas, J. (1981). Historia y crítica de la opinión pública: la transformación estructural de la vida pública (pp. 1-171). Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Han, B.-C. (2012). La sociedad de la transparencia (R. P. Gabás Pallás, ed. Primera edición, segunda reimpresión). Herder Editorial. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k5qb
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Bene!ts, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Karl, T. L. (1986). Imposing Consent? Electoralism vs. Democratization in El Salvador. In P. Drake & E. Silva (Eds.), Elections and Democratization in Latin America (pp. 9-36). Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies University of California San Diego.
Lombana-Bermúdez, A., Mejía, M. V., Gómez, L., & Pino Uribe, J. F. (2022). Cámaras de eco, desinformación y campañas de desprestigio en Colombia. Política y Gobierno, XXIX(1), 1-30.
Mazzoleni, G. (2010) La comunicación política. Editorial Alianza
Mercier, A. (2012). La comunicación política. La Crujía. Melo, J. D., Pino-Uribe, J. F. P., & Gómez, L. M. (2023). Desinformación en la democracia subnacional: Un estudio de caso de la campaña de Claudia López para la Alcaldía de Bogotá en Twitter en 2019. 11(11), 131-162. https://doi.org/10.54887/27376192.74
Mouffe, C. (2012). La paradoja democrática. Editorial Gedisa.
Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. In The People vs. Democracy. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674984776
Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400203500101
Negrete Huelga, K. (2022). Comunicación en el gobierno: lo gubernamental y lo público en la transformación de la relación con el ciudadano. Sintaxis. Revista Cientí"ca del Centro de Investigación para la Comunicación Aplicada, 8, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.36105/stx.2022n8.07
O’Donnell, G. (1993). On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355- 1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(93)90048-E
Oszlak, O., & Kaufman, R. (2011). De!niendo al Estado abierto: Notas para el debate y una agenda de investigación. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, (50), 65-87.
Parmelee, J.H. (2014). The agenda building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16(3), 434-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487955
Rodríguez Pérez, C. (2019). No diga fake news, di desinformación: una revisión sobre el fenómeno de las noticias falsas y sus implicaciones. Comunicación, 40, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.18566/comunica.n40.a05
Rubio, R. (2014). “Twitter y la teoría de la agenda setting: mensajes de la opinión pública digital”. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20, 249-264. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2014.v20.n1.45230
Sartori, G. (2007). ¿Qué es la democracia? Taurus.
Sani, G., & Sartori, G. (1980). Polarización, fragmentación y competición en las democracias occidentales. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.7.1980.8032
Revista de Derecho Político, (7), 7-37. Schmidthuber, L., Ingrams, A., & Hilgers, D. (2021). Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13298
Schumpeter, J. A. (1994). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. http://www.crcnetbase.com/isbn/9780203202050
Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Smith, S., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., & Millard, J. (2012). Understanding eParticipation State of Play in Europe. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716994
Verjovsky, M., Barreto, M. P., Carmo, I., Coutinho, B., Thomer, L., Lifschitz, S., & Jurberg, C. (2023). Political quarrel overshadows vaccination advocacy: How the vaccine debate on Brazilian Twitter was framed by anti-vaxxers during Bolsonaro administration. Vaccine, 41(39), 5715-5721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.075
Uribe, J.F.P., Cely, A.M. (2023). The Little Red Book and the Case of Left-Wing Political Extremism in Colombia. In: Zúquete, J.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism, Volume 2. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36268-2_6
Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2017) Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe report, DGI (2017) 9.
Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International journal of public administration, 38(5), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735
Wike, R., & Fetterolf, J. (2018). Liberal Democracy’s Crisis of Con!dence. Journal of Democracy 29(4), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0069.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2023 Reflexión Política
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
